By William Gjebre, FloridaBulldog.org
Marco Rubio
Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach public schools have lost hundreds of millions of dollars since 2004 when the Florida Legislature changed the way schools are funded – an action linked to the political ambitions of Republican Party presidential candidate Marco Rubio.
The New York Times reported Oct. 21 that then-State Rep. Rubio bargained for political support to become speaker of the Florida House in exchange for not opposing measures that diverted funds from large school districts like his home county of Miami-Dade to smaller districts upstate.
Rubio served as Florida House Speaker from 2006-2008. According to The Times, he secured the position in 2003 with backing from upstate legislators after he agreed not to oppose measures that would reduce funding to heavily populated areas with higher property tax bases like Miami and increase spending in less dense, rural regions in the state.
Rubio, 44, now a first-term U.S. senator and serious Republican challenger for his party’s presidential nomination next year, did not respond to requests for comment left with his campaign and his Senate office. The Times, however, reported that Rubio previously said there were no tradeoffs in his successful effort to become Speaker of the House, and that he had complained that there was excessive spending and waste of funds by the Miami-Dade school district.
The changes that have cost South Florida’s school districts so much included alterations to the school funding formula that determined student allocations. One change to the Florida Education Finance Program (FEFP) involved the addition of an “amenity factor” to the so-called district cost differential, or DCD, which at the time sent more money to large districts due to their higher costs of living.
Another change involved so-called “compression or equalization” funding in which school districts rich in local property taxes – like Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach – saw funds above a statewide average taken away and given to less property-rich districts. Under this take-from-the-rich-and-give-to-the-poor arrangement, school districts in South Florida became known as “donors.”
The changes, signed into law by then-Gov. Jeb Bush, were effective starting in the 2004-2005 school year.
At the request of FloridaBulldog.org, Miami-Dade Public Schools compiled a list of the cumulative gains and losses from then until now due to those funding changes at school districts in each of Florida’s 67 counties.
MIAMI-DADE THE BIGGEST LOSER
Miami-Dade County Public Schools was the biggest loser of state funds, with an eye-popping total loss of slightly more than $1 billion.
Broward County Public Schools took the second biggest hit, ranking 66th among Florida’s 67 county school districts with total losses from 2004 thru 2015-16 due to the funding changes of $509 million.
Palm Beach Public Schools was third with losses of $335 million, and ranked 65th among the counties, according to the list. Even Monroe County schools lost big: $30.5 million, ranking 63rd.
The Miami-Dade School’s study also found the biggest winner from the funding changes was Duval County, with a cumulative gain of $309 million since the 2004-2005 school year. Hillsborough County ranked second with a $271 million gain and Polk County was third with a gain of $225 million.
Federick Ingram
Fedrick Ingram, the recently elected vice president of the Florida Education Association and outgoing president of the United Teachers of Dade, said the funding loss in South Florida impacted teacher salaries and resulted in some program cuts.
“He (Rubio) could have assisted the local area … but supported more funds for the north (schools districts), ‘’ Ingram said. “He chose personal ambition.”
School districts in Broward and Palm Beach confirmed that they, too, suffered significant cumulative losses as a result of the changes to the funding formula and the district cost differential since 2004. They calculated their total losses to be millions of dollars lower than what Miami-Dade found.
Broward County Public Schools lost approximately $346 million since 2004 as a result of the changes, according to the district’s public information office. An official with knowledge of financing at Palm Beach County Public Schools said that district lost $189 million through last year as a result in the changes.
The Times story outlined how Rubio, after being elected to the House in a special election in 2000, set out to curry favor with House Republican leaders, leading to his ascent to House speaker after making the alleged deal.
While the Legislature was in session in 2004, the Miami-Dade School Board attempted to thwart the funding changes. Records show that on April 14, 2004 the board instructed staff that its top issue was to “preserve” the existing favorable district cost differential.
But a month later, with the change apparently by then approved by the Legislature, the Board instructed staff to hire lawyers to sue to stop it. The legal effort was later joined by the Broward and Palm Beach school districts.
SCHOOL DISTRICTS’ CASE TOSSED OUT
The courts, however, dismissed the case about June 2005. But not before legal costs rose to $620,000, the Miami-Dade School Board was later informed. Broward paid $150,000 and Palm Beach, $125,000.
It didn’t take long before Miami-Dade and other large districts felt the pain of the funding cuts.
Then-Miami-Dade Superintendent Rudy Crew outlined the financial impact of the changes at the March 12, 2008 School Board meeting.
“The continuation of the loss of the DCD has meant that between 2004 and now this district has lost approximately $200 million,” said Crew, according to the minutes. He went on to discuss a series of budget cuts that included layoffs and furlough days.
Two months later, at its May 5, 2008 meeting, the school board was informed that the losses were worse than originally thought.
“Another impact has been equalization of local millage where the state adopted a policy that deprived Miami-Dade and other like counties of general revenues coming from general revenue taxes – sales taxes,” explained then-Associate Superintendent Alberto Carvalho, according to the minutes.
“The impact of that on Miami-Dade over the past four years, beginning in 2005-2006, with a $10 million hit progressing all the way to 2007-2008, current year, to the tune of $67 million, and projected to become $18 million next year,” Carvalho said.
Adam Hasner, a former Florida legislator who was a part of Rubio’s Tallahassee team, did not return calls for comment. The New York Times story reported Hasner praised Rubio for looking out for the entire state rather than just his home county.
But that stance also appears to have helped Rubio achieve what only two other South Florida politicians have accomplished in the last half-century: capturing the powerful post of Speaker of the Florida House.
While Miami-Dade school officials fumed about the funding cuts, at least one education watchdog cheered the changes. Charlotte Greenbarg, who for years has closely monitored education in Miami-Dade and Broward, said the funding change was necessary because the large districts had wasteful spending practices.
Miami-Dade, Greenbarg said, was top heavy with high-paying administrators, many of them earning more than $100,000 year while teachers were paid much less.
John Hopkins / November 12, 2015 11:15 am
So Rubio sold out his home county to support his ambitions. And in the process he undid what South Florida legislators managed to achieve a generation earlier when they pulled together a rare coalition with Tampa and Orlando and perhaps Jacksonville to reverse the old pork chop gang’s school-funding unfairness to big-city schools.
/
Charlotte Greenbarg / November 13, 2015 4:54 pm
And the big city schools were throwing money away as if it were water. Two wrongs don’t make a right.
I still have the information we published in the Sun-Sentinel showing how much the top 100 administrators made in Broward. People were slack-jawed. They voted down the tax increase 71-29.
And before that we took the data to Tallahassee to show them how much the top 100 were paid in Dade. They stood around in clusters looking at the printouts. I remember the lobbyist who sneered at us when we suggested that $50K was a lot to pay for a PE shelter, that the PTA bought one for $10K. He said OK then take it out of the budget and let the PTA pay for it. He was one who made over $100K and on the list.
Nothing much has changed, has it?
/
Ron Palmer / November 14, 2015 6:01 am
The answer to why he could care less about public education is simple: His children attend Christian school; the oldest, a Catholic high school.
/
Javier Berezdivin / November 14, 2015 10:21 am
If bloated salaries and irresponsible spending was the problem, correcting that should have been the response, not changing the district cost differential. That was like throwing out the baby with the bath water! The reality has been that large school districts were cut to the bone when the recession hit in 2006-07. Had this formula not been in place we might not have had such large numbers of teachers cut. The reality that so many programs were decimated, including arts, foreign languages, counselors, and librarians is a testament to the negative impact these cuts had in our public schools system. It sad Rubio sold us out.
/
Charlotte Greenbarg / November 30, 2015 7:40 pm
And why didn’t the districts cut the bloated administration? Cut to the bone? Please don’t try to make excuses for their waste and corruption.
/