As some judges balk at Broward’s new high-rise courthouse, BSO has security issues

By Dan Christensen, FloridaBulldog.org 

Broward’s new 20-story courthouse tower

Broward’s juvenile delinquency judges have refused to move into the county’s new $276.4 million high-rise courthouse, while Broward Sheriff’s officials described the building as riddled with security issues, including a “serious escape risk.”

A Feb. 15 BSO internal memo obtained by Florida Bulldog lists 25 security issues or design flaws identified during a “thorough examination of the detention area” of the 20-story structure. Some might seem comical if they weren’t so serious.

For example, the report notes that light switches and thermostats for holding cells are located inside, instead of outside, the cells, giving inmates control.

BSO requested immediate corrective action to remove the switches and thermostats.

“The light switches should only be controlled by staff in the control room,” the memo says. “The temperature should only be controlled by staff in the control room.”

Further, the memo says lighting is adjusted by certain efficiency measures. Those measures “must be removed so that the cell lighting is strictly controlled by staff. Inmates in the holding cells must be visible at all times.”

Assistant County Administrator Alphonso Jefferson said juvenile courtrooms, like other courtrooms, were “built in accordance with approved design plans” signed off on by the court years ago. He nevertheless said the county is working with the sheriff’s office to make the desired fixes.d

Broward Assistant County Manager Alphonso Jefferson

“I’m aware of this and these are punch-list items,” he said. “There are punch-list items with any building, items you have that need to be addressed. We’ve had numerous walk-throughs with BSO and we’ve identified these items that are additional.”

BSO declined to comment, except to say that the memo, prepared by Captain Veronica Carroll, commander of the detention department’s Central Intake Bureau, was later updated. A request to see a copy of the updated memo was denied.

Juvenile delinquency judges say no thanks

Apparently not fixable, however, were matters of concern to enough of the county’s four juvenile delinquency judges that they decided recently to remain in or move to courtrooms in the courthouse’s modern North Tower on Southwest Third Avenue in Fort Lauderdale.

“Judge [Elijah] Williams and I went over there and it didn’t take us long to figure out that those courtrooms were not appropriate for juvenile delinquency court,” said Broward Juvenile Court Judge Carlos Rebollo.

Among other things, he said, the new juvenile courtrooms located on the tower’s ninth floor are “very small,” include no jury box where in-custody juveniles are kept while in court and have “holding cells that looked like a prison.”

“You’re dealing with juveniles and the last thing you want to do is put them in an environment in which it looks like they’re in prison,” said Rebollo.

The juvenile holding cells, which do not allow for the separation of male and female inmates, have open toilets.

“The way these things were designed was very institutionalized and the judges were very adamant that they didn’t want these kids to be placed in those holding cells,” said Chief Assistant Public Defender Gordon Weekes, whose office also opposed the new juvenile courtrooms. “They have an open toilet. You put four kids in there and if one has to use the bathroom they have to do it in front of the other three with no partition, and maybe even in front of an adult passing through.”

Fixes would be costly

Weekes said the cost to modify the juvenile facilities to make them acceptable for such work would have been great.

“It’s my understanding after speaking to the county that it would be millions of dollars to fix issues in the juvenile courtrooms,” Weekes said. The courtrooms will now apparently be repurposed.

To date, the new tower remains largely unoccupied. Those that have moved in include the clerk of courts, the state attorney, BSO and probate courts, Jefferson said. March 20 was set to be the date by which most of the judges would move in, but the date was said by two sources to have been abandoned amid an argument between the county and BSO on appropriate security staffing levels.

BSO’s memo addresses a variety of security deficiencies in the new courthouse, the most critical of which was in the sally port, the secure gateway between the jail and court. One issue cited in the report “poses a serious escape risk.” The underline is in the memo.

Other issues include “numerous blind spots” that pose life safety issues, fire sprinklers can be too easily tampered with by inmate, and “in-cell cameras are encased in cheap plastic that is easily manipulated.’’ The detention area also has no Self Contained Breathing Apparatus, a device that can provide breathable air in an emergency.

Of particular concern to Weekes was another holding cell deficiency: a handicap railing that’s “contrary to suicide prevention.”

“Most people think of a jail suicide as someone hanging from an overhead bar, but anyone can wrap a towel around their neck and lean forward. That’s just as effective. I don’t understand why they would allow that.”

Print Friendly
4 Comments Post a Comment
  1. ilene' folly says:

    The architects that were selected did not know what they were doing and the builder is known for his shoddy workmanship. These people were selected by Ilene Lieberman for political reasons and not on merit. Too bad the current commissioners will be getting the blame. Many more problems have not been made public.

  2. Need answers says:

    I think it is time for answers. This project is way over budget and time deadlines when you consider the loss of use. A courthouse has design needs that other office buildings do not. Jurors, the public, judges, and criminals that often need to appear on the civil side often need to be separated. Security is always a concern. Did the design professionals have the experience needed for a project like this? How were they selected. Were any lobbyists involved? Were there any campaign contributions or donations made to commissioners or administrators favorite charities? Did the builder have experience building a courthouse? How was he selected and same questions as above. What was the result achieved on other projects that the designers and builders worked on in the past. Were there delays and over runs? Did they have design problems later? Is a 20 story courthouse common? The sheriff says that the number of stories drives up the cost of security as separate staff is needed on each floor. Would a 10 story courthouse have been cheaper and better to secure? How much operating cost could have been saved? Didn’t the same issue come up after they built the Broward Jail? Are the same people who screwed things up so far going to be used to build the parking structure? How does the building work for the jurors and their needs? How has the design changed from the old courthouse? Have chambers been eliminated so that parties can no longer meet around a table to settle disputes and now that function can only take place in the combative setting of a courtroom? Are bathrooms available for jurors and does the layout of the new building increase the security cost? Have some of the building components failed already? Was the building built with finishes and supplied with equipment on the cheap that will require more maintenance and replacement? How bad was the mold problem in the new building that was caused by the plumbing flood and has testing be done recently to see if it is now in the air Ducts? Has the illegal ramp been dealt with and why has the designer not been held accountable? Are there other ADA problems that we don’t know about yet? Has an independent ADA consultant looked at the layout of the courtroom?

    Answering these question would helpful to Broward Taxpayers and help the folks in Dade County so that they will not repeat the Broward Courthouse disaster. Perhaps a good newspaper like the Miami Herald could investigate?

  3. Marty says:

    So the voters were correct when they voted against funding a new court house because they know the County is incompetent and giving them money for such a project would be pissing down a toilet. What a third would cesspool

  4. unique says:

    The new Broward Courthouse cost the taxpayers $276.4 with serious defects.
    Not one person noticed the defects before the courthouse was built by looking
    at the plans or the workers while they were doing the work.

    All I can say is that if an electrician does not know he is putting the electrical work on the wrong side of the wall and says nothing, we are all in big trouble.
    This is why people do not have jobs. Who was the inspector that inspected the work after it was finished ??? Was he looking at his shoes ??? Not one word from the inspector. This is very sad. All of these people should be fired and made to pay for the work that needs to be redone that they were paid for ???

    In the future, contracts should say the work needs to be done correctly, the work needs to be finished on time, there will not be any cost over runs, there
    will not be any pay if the above is not met.

    The residents of Broward County do not want to pay taxes for shoddy work.

Leave a Reply




Newsletter

Notify me by email when new stories are published.

Bulldog Archives